Talk:Jonah Hill

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jonah Hill article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Justin Long and Jonah Hill

I thought these two met on Campus Ladies, Accepted came out after the show. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.173.225.74 (talk) 16:02, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

Abuse allegations

Why was the paragraph on the abuse allegations removed? It has been reported by US Magazine and should be added back. local friendtalk 19:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. It has become widely reported in a lot of publications and websites and all over social media 11:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Chwyatt (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it. Content is well-sourced and notable. Page should be protected if reversions persist. Bangabandhu (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it say he "politely" set the boundaries? That feels subjective. Instead, it should just state the facts and allow people to decide on their own if the way in which he set boundaries was "polite". DisgruntledRayofSunshine (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Someone has also deleted the entire paragraph in the meantime but I have just restored the previous version. ~ local friendtalk 14:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brady is not a professional surf instructor. She is a lawyer who surfs as a hobby, by her own admission in texts between Brady and Hill in which she complains that the media refers to her as a surfer when she is actually "a lawyer to be". RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both citations reference her as a professional surfer and surf instructor. local friendtalk 11:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By her own admission in those DMs, that's not correct. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She's both - I just included the verbiage to the article plus a source for both. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So if I study to become a doctor, I am a doctor? What kind of reasoning is that? She is not a lawyer, she is a student, show me when she passed the bar? Why are there so many crazies on this page? Wikipedia is about objectivity and showing both sides in such sensitive topics. Johannesvdp (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hills exact text is "If these things bring you to a place of happiness I will support it and there will be no hard feelings", and goes on to say he will not be her partner if she chooses those things. In view of that, the text "Hill *forbade* her from surfing with other men, posting pictures of herself in a swimsuit, and spending time with friends he did not approve of". Would it not be more accurate to say "Hill said he could not continue the relationship if she continued surfing with other men, posting pictures of herself in a swimsuit, and spending time with friends he did not approve of" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:1815:1F00:588B:433E:1AF9:A82B (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and done LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that what "forbid" means? local friendtalk 11:06, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it as being the same as it's giving her an option and boundaries, he's saying if she wants to then she can but not while being his partner. More of an ultimatum than forbidding. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]